| Feature / Service | Azure Load Balancer | Application Gateway | Azure Front Door | Traffic Manager |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSI Layer | Layer 4 (Transport) | Layer 7 (Application) | Layer 7 (Application) | DNS-based (Layer 7 via DNS) |
| Scope | Regional or Global | Regional | Global | Global |
| Traffic Type | TCP/UDP (non-HTTP/S) | HTTP/HTTPS | HTTP/HTTPS | Any (via DNS redirection) |
| Protocol Awareness | No content inspection | URL path, host header, SSL termination | URL path, host header, SSL termination, caching | DNS-based routing only |
| Health Probes | TCP/HTTP/HTTPS | HTTP/HTTPS | HTTP/HTTPS | DNS endpoint monitoring |
| Session Affinity | Source IP affinity | Cookie-based | Supported | Not supported |
| Web Application Firewall | β | β | β | β |
| SSL Termination | β | β | β | β |
| Caching / CDN | β | β | β | β |
| Public/Private Support | β Both | β Both | β Public only | β Public only |
| Use Case | Internal or external TCP/UDP balancing | Secure web apps with custom routing | Global web apps with low latency | Geo-routing and DNS-based failover |
| Best For | VM-level traffic, AKS, backend services | Web apps needing WAF, SSL offload | APIs, static content, multi-region apps | Multi-region apps needing DNS balancing |
| Pricing | Basic (free), Standard (paid) | Standard_v2 / WAF_v2 | Standard / Premium | Based on DNS queries and monitoring |
Category: Nutshell Series
π§© OSI Model Layers β Complete Overview
| Layer | Function | Key Protocols & Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Application (7) | Closest to the user; provides network services and interfaces for applications | HTTP, FTP, DNS, SMTP, SNMP |
| Presentation (6) | Translates, encrypts, compresses data; ensures machine-independent data formatting | SSL/TLS, JPEG, MPEG, ASCII, EBCDIC |
| Session (5) | Manages sessions or connections between applications; handles authentication and synchronization | NetBIOS, RPC, PPTP, SAP, SDP |
| Transport (4) | Provides reliable or unreliable data transport with error recovery and flow control | TCP, UDP, SCTP, SPX |
| Network (3) | Handles logical addressing and routing between different networks | IP (IPv4/IPv6), ICMP, IGMP, IPsec |
| Data Link (2) | Ensures reliable transfer across physical link; handles MAC addressing and framing | Ethernet, PPP, ARP, MAC, HDLC, Frame Relay |
| Physical (1) | Transmits raw bitstreams over physical media; defines hardware specs and signal modulation | Coaxial cable, RJ45, Fiber optics, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Hubs |
βοΈ Cloud Migration Strategies in a Nutshell
Thinking about moving to the cloud? Thereβs more than one way to get there. Each migration approach has its own pros, cons, and ideal use cases. In this post, weβll break down six major cloud migration strategies that organizations use to transition smoothly and smartly.
π§± 1. Lift and Shift (Rehost)
Move it as-is. This strategy involves migrating your existing apps to the cloud without any code changes.
- β Fastest method
- β No code changes
- β Doesnβt leverage cloud-native benefits
- Best for: Legacy apps or fast migrations
π οΈ 2. Replatform
Tweak a little. Make minor changes to use managed cloud services (like migrating from on-prem SQL Server to Azure SQL Database).
- β Better performance
- β Less maintenance
- β Still not fully cloud-native
- Best for: Apps needing light optimization
π 3. Refactor (Re-architect)
Redesign for the cloud. This involves reworking app architecture to use microservices, containers, or serverless technologies.
- β Maximum scalability and cloud benefits
- β Future-proof architecture
- β Higher cost and complexity
- Best for: Strategic modernization of core systems
ποΈ 4. Repurchase
Buy new (SaaS). Replace your existing app with a SaaS solution, like moving to Salesforce or Microsoft 365.
- β Low maintenance
- β Fastest implementation
- β Limited customizability
- Best for: Standard tools like CRM, HR, or Email
ποΈ 5. Retire
Let it go. Identify and decommission apps that are no longer used or necessary.
- β Saves cost
- β Reduces system clutter
- β Risk of dependencies
- Best for: Obsolete or duplicate applications
β³ 6. Retain
Keep it on-prem for now. Retain certain applications that are not ready for the cloud due to business or technical constraints.
- β Safe for sensitive workloads
- β Misses out on cloud benefits
- Best for: Apps with regulatory or latency concerns
π Quick Comparison Table
| Strategy | Code Change | Speed | Cloud Benefits | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lift & Shift | β None | π’ Fast | π΄ Low | Legacy/Quick Wins |
| Replatform | β οΈ Minor | π‘ Medium | π‘ Partial | Light Optimization |
| Refactor | β High | π΄ Slow | π’ Full | Strategic Modernization |
| Repurchase | β None | π’ Fast | π’ Full (SaaS) | Commodity Tools |
| Retire | β N/A | π’ Fast | π΄ N/A | Unused Systems |
| Retain | β N/A | N/A | π΄ None | Critical On-Prem Apps |
Containers vs. Virtual Machines: Whatβs the Difference?
Understanding Containers and VMs
Containers: Lightweight & Agile
Containers provide application-level isolation, using the host operating systemβs kernel. They are fast, scalable, and resource-efficient, ideal for microservices and cloud deployments.
Virtual Machines: Full OS Environments
VMs, on the other hand, provide full isolation by running a complete operating system inside a virtualized environment. They are great for strong security boundaries and running multiple OS types on the same hardware.
Comparison Table: Containers vs. Virtual Machines
| Feature | Virtual Machine (VM) | Container |
|---|---|---|
| Isolation | Provides strong isolation with its own OS kernel. | Lightweight isolation, shares host OS kernel. |
| Operating System | Runs a full OS, including the kernel. | Runs only user-mode OS components. |
| Resource Usage | Needs more CPU, memory, storage. | Uses fewer system resources. |
| Guest Compatibility | Can run any OS (Linux, Windows, etc.). | Runs same OS version as the host. |
| Deployment | Managed via Hyper-V, VMware, VirtualBox. | Uses Docker, Kubernetes for deployment. |
| Updates & Upgrades | Requires full OS upgrades & manual updates. | Easily updated via image rebuild process. |
| Storage & Networking | Uses virtual hard disks (VHDs), private networks. | Uses shared storage, network isolation. |
| Fault Tolerance | VM failover restarts the OS on a new server. | Containers are recreated instantly by an orchestrator. |
| Load Balancing | Moves VMs to balance workloads. | Orchestrators scale containers dynamically. |
Which One Should You Use?
Both containers and VMs complement each other. Containers are best for modern, cloud-native applications, while VMs provide stronger security and OS flexibility. In fact, many container deployments run on VMs for enhanced scalability!
Which solution fits your workload best? Containers, VMs, or both? Letβs discuss in the comments! π
π§ Troubleshooting Azure Storage Table Entity Insert Error: Network Rule Blocking Requests
When working with Azure Storage Accounts configured in a private network, you may occasionally face connectivity issues, especially during programmatic operations like inserting entities into a Table Storage. Recently, while inserting a new entity, we encountered the following error:
ERROR:
The request may be blocked by network rules of storage account.
Please check network rule set using
'az storage account show -n accountname --query networkRuleSet'.
If you want to change the default action to apply when no rule matches,
please use 'az storage account update'.
This error clearly indicates that the network rules on the storage account are blocking the request. Here’s how we debugged and resolved the issue.
π§ͺ Problem Context
Our setup involves:
- A private endpoint-enabled Azure Storage Account.
- IP whitelisting done dynamically during the pipeline using GitHub Actions.
- The following command used to allow the runner’s IP address:
az storage account network-rule add \
--resource-group ${{ vars.RESOURCEGROUP_NAME }} \
--account-name ${{ vars.STORAGEACCOUNT_NAME }} \
--action Allow \
--ip-address ${{ steps.ip.outputs.ipv4 }} \
-o none --only-show-errors
Despite successfully executing this command, any immediate operation (like inserting into Table Storage) would fail with the aforementioned error.
π Root Cause
Azure’s network rule updatesβsuch as IP whitelistingβare not instantaneous. Even though the az command returns success, the rules can take 5 to 30 seconds to fully propagate across Azure’s networking stack.
This propagation delay means that your request may still be blocked right after whitelisting, resulting in transient errors.
β Resolution
To work around this, we added a short delay after the IP whitelist command before initiating any storage operations. Hereβs a sample shell script update:
echo "Whitelisting IP: ${{ steps.ip.outputs.ipv4 }}"
az storage account network-rule add \
--resource-group ${{ vars.RESOURCEGROUP_NAME }} \
--account-name ${{ vars.STORAGEACCOUNT_NAME }} \
--action Allow \
--ip-address ${{ steps.ip.outputs.ipv4 }} \
-o none --only-show-errors
echo "Waiting for network rule to propagate..."
sleep 30 # Adjust between 5-30 seconds based on testing
# Now perform the table insert operation
π‘ Pro Tips
- Use retries: If you’re automating this via scripts or CI/CD pipelines, consider implementing a retry mechanism instead of a fixed sleep.
- Log current rules: Use the following command to verify if the IP is indeed whitelisted:
az storage account show -n <account-name> --query networkRuleSet.ipRules - Audit Logs: Check Azure Activity Logs for insights into rule application times.
π§Ύ Conclusion
When dealing with Azure Storage Accounts in a private network, remember that network rule changes aren’t immediate. Always plan for a short delay or retry logic to handle propagation time. This small adjustment can save hours of confusion and debugging.
5 Famous Laws That Offer Life Lessons for Better Living β¨
In a world full of chaos and decision-making, there are a few timeless lawsβsome humorous, some philosophicalβthat offer surprising clarity and guidance. These famous principles, though not necessarily written in a constitution or passed in court, have earned a respected place in both professional and personal spaces. Letβs dive into five such “laws” that continue to shape how we think, act, and succeed. π
1. Murphyβs Law π¬
βAnything that can go wrong, will go wrong.β
This famously pessimistic law serves as a humble reminder that life doesnβt always go as planned. While it may sound discouraging, Murphyβs Law teaches us the importance of being prepared. π§―
2. Kidlinβs Law βοΈ
βIf you write the problem down clearly, then the matter is half solved.β
Clarity is power. π‘ Often, weβre overwhelmed not by the problem itself, but by its vague nature. By defining and articulating the issue, Kidlinβs Law reminds us that solutions start to unfold naturally. π§
3. Gilbertβs Law π οΈ
βWhen you take on a task, finding the best way to achieve the desired result is always your responsibility.β
This law emphasizes ownership and mindful execution. π― Itβs about doing things with focus and integrity, pursuing results without burnout. ποΈ
4. Wilsonβs Law π
βIf you prioritize knowledge and intelligence, money will continue to come.β
Invest in your mind, and the rewards will follow. πΈ Wilsonβs Law reminds us that wisdom and growth pave the most sustainable paths to success. π±
5. Falklandβs Law π€
βIf you donβt have to make a decision about something, then donβt decide.β
This principle teaches that not every decision is necessary. π§ββοΈ Avoiding mental clutter can lead to better focus and less stress. π§
Final Thoughts π
These five laws are more than catchy quotesβthey are guiding lights in uncertain times. π Whether you’re managing a business, building your career, or navigating personal challenges, remembering these principles can give you clarity, resilience, and peace of mind. π§ββοΈ
Which of these laws speaks to you the most? Have one of your own? Share it in the comments! π¬π
.NET Framework vs .NET Core: Key Differences
.NET Framework and .NET Core differ significantly in architecture, deployment, performance, and their support for modern development needs. Below is a detailed comparison covering both high-level and low-level aspects.
Key Differences
| Feature | .NET Framework | .NET Core |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Windows only | Cross-platform (Windows, Linux, macOS) |
| Performance | Moderate due to legacy architecture | Optimized for high performance with Just-In-Time (JIT) and Ahead-Of-Time (AOT) compilation improvements |
| Deployment | Requires installation of .NET Framework on the system | Can be deployed as a self-contained application without requiring .NET installation |
| Microservices Support | Limited support due to monolithic architecture | Designed for microservices with built-in support for containerization (Docker, Kubernetes) |
| Future Development | No longer actively developed (last version .NET Framework 4.8) | Actively maintained, evolved into .NET 8+ |
| Runtime | CLR (Common Language Runtime) with Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation | CoreCLR with improved JIT and support for Ahead-Of-Time (AOT) compilation |
| APIs & Libraries | Includes older Windows-specific APIs (e.g., WCF, Web Forms, Windows Workflow Foundation) | Uses .NET Standard libraries and modern APIs with broader compatibility |
| Development Model | Traditional Windows development with limited DevOps support | Supports modern DevOps practices, CI/CD pipelines, and cloud-native applications |
Low-Level Differences
- Garbage Collection: .NET Core has an improved garbage collection mechanism, including low-latency GC modes suitable for high-performance applications.
- Memory Management: .NET Core optimizes memory usage with Span and ValueTask to reduce allocations and improve efficiency.
- Networking: .NET Core provides an enhanced networking stack with HTTP/2 support, asynchronous programming improvements, and lower latency.
- Security Model: .NET Core follows a more modular security model with built-in support for modern authentication protocols (OAuth, OpenID Connect).
- Threading and Concurrency: .NET Core enhances parallel processing with features like System.Threading.Channels and Task-based asynchronous patterns.
The choice between .NET Framework and .NET Core depends on your needs. If you’re maintaining legacy applications that rely on Windows-specific features, .NET Framework is suitable. However, for new, scalable, high-performance applications, .NET Core (or .NET 8+) is the best choice.
AWS vs Azure vs GCP
AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Azure (Microsoft) vs GCP (Google Cloud Platform) – A Quick Comparison of the main services
Storage
| Service type | Description | AWS | Azure | GCP |
| Object storage | For storing any files you regularly use | Simple Storage Service (S3) | Blob Storage | Cloud Storage Buckets |
| Archive storage | Low cost (but slower) storage for rarely used files | S3 Glacier Instant, Glacier Flexible, Glacier Deep Archive tiers | Blob Cool/Cold/Archive tiers | Cloud Storage Nearline, Coldline, Archive tiers |
| File storage | For storing files needing hierarchical organization | Elastic File System (EFS), FSx | Avers vFXT, Files | Filestore |
| Block storage | For storing groups of related files | Elastic Block Storage | Disk Storage | Persistent Disk |
| Hybrid storage | Move files between on-prem & cloud | Storage Gateway | StorSimple, Migrate | Storage Transfer Service |
| Edge/offline storage | Move offline data to the cloud | Snowball | Data Box | Transfer Appliance |
| Backup | Prevent data loss | Backup | Backup | Backup and Disaster Recovery |
Database
| Service type | Description | AWS | Azure | GCP |
| Relational DB management | Standard SQL DB (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, etc.) | Relational Database Service (RDS), Aurora | SQL, SQL Database | Cloud SQL, Cloud Spanner |
| NoSQL: Key-value | Redis-like DBs for semi-structured data | DynamoDB | Cosmos DB, Table storage | Cloud BigTable, Firestore |
| NoSQL: Document | MongoDB/CouchDB-like DBs for hierarchical JSON data | DocumentDB | Cosmos DB | Firestore, Firebase Realtime Database |
| NoSQL: Column store | Cassandra/HBase-like DBs for structured hierarchical data | Keyspaces | Cosmos DB | Cloud BigTable |
| NoSQL: Graph | Neo4j-like DBs for connected data | Neptune | N/A | N/A |
| Caching | Redis/Memcached-like memory for calculations | ElastiCache | Cache for Redis, HPC Cache | Memorystore |
| Time Series DB | DB tuned for time series data | Timestream | Time Series Insights | Cloud BigTable |
| Blockchain | Dogecoin, etc. | Managed Blockchain | Blockchain Service, Blockchain Workbench, Confidential Ledger | N/A |
Compute
| Service type | Description | AWS | Azure | GCP |
| Virtual machines | Software-emulated computers | Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) | Virtual Machines | Compute Engine |
| Spot virtual machines | Cost-effective VMs | EC2 Spot Instances | Spot Virtual Machines | Spot VMs |
| Autoscaling | Adjust resources to match demand | EC2 Auto Scaling | Virtual Machine Scale Sets | Instance Groups |
| Functions as a service (Serverless computing) | Execute code chunks without worrying about infrastructure | Lambda | Functions | Cloud Functions |
| Platform as a service | Manage applications without worrying about infrastructure | Elastic Beanstalk, Red Hat OpenShift on AWS | App Service, Cloud Services, Spring Cloud, Red Hat OpenShift | App Engine |
| Batch scheduling | Run code at specified times | Batch | Batch | Batch, Cloud Scheduler |
| Isolated servers | VM on your own machine, for high security | Dedicated Instances | Dedicated Host | Sole-tenant Nodes, Shielded VMs |
| On-premise/Edge devices | Cloud-services on your own hardware | Outposts, Snow Family | Modular Datacenter, Stack Hub, Stack HCI, Stack Edge | N/A |
| Quantum computing | Determine if cat is alive or dead | Braket | Quantum | N/A |
Analytics
ML & AI
Networking & Content Delivery
| Service type | Description | AWS | Azure | GCP |
| Content delivery network | Serve content to users | CloudFront | Content Delivery Network | Cloud CDN and Media CDN |
| Application Programming Interface (API) management | Build and deploy APIs | API Gateway | API Apps, API Management | Apigee API Management |
| Domain Name System (DNS) | Route end users to applications | Route 53 | DNS | Cloud DNS |
| Load balancing | Distribute work evenly across machines | Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) | Application Gateway, Load Balancer, Traffic Manager | Cloud Load Balancing |
Containers
| Service type | Description | AWS | Azure | GCP |
| Managed containers | Run and deploy containers | Elastic Kubernetes Service, Elastic Container Service | Kubernetes Service, Container Apps | Kubernetes Engine |
| Container registration | Manage container images | Elastic Container Registry | Container Registry | Artifact Registry |
Management & Security, Identity
| Service type | Description | AWS | Azure | GCP |
| Access management | User permissions and authentication | Identity and Access Management (IAM) | Entra ID | Cloud Identity |
| Activity tracking | Track user Activity | CloudTrail | Monitor Activity Log | Access Transparency and Access Approval |
| Security | Protect your data, network and applications | Security Hub | Security | Security Command Center |
| Monitoring | Monitor network traffic and detect anomalies | CloudWatch, Transit Gateway Network Manager | Monitor, Anomaly Detector | Operations, Network Intelligence Center |
| Automation | Preform processes automatically | OpsWorks | Automation | Compute Engine Management |
| Cost optimization | Reduce your cloud spend | Cost Optimization | Cost Management | Recommender |
Integration
Troubleshooting SFTP and HTTPS Connectivity from Azure Logic Apps and Function Apps
When working with Azure Logic Apps or Azure Function Apps, you may encounter connectivity issues when integrating with SFTP servers or HTTPS endpoints. This guide provides troubleshooting steps using tnc, tcping, ssh, and openssl commands.
1. Troubleshooting SFTP Connectivity
Step 1: Check Network Connectivity
To ensure that the SFTP server is reachable, use tnc (Test-NetConnection) and tcping:
# Using Test-NetConnection (PowerShell) tnc <sftp-server> -Port 22 # Using tcping (Command Prompt) tcping <sftp-server> 22
Common Errors and Fixes:
- Request timed out / Connection refused: Indicates a firewall or network security group (NSG) restriction. Investigate network configurations.
- No route to host: The destination might be unreachable due to VPN, VNET, or firewall restrictions.
Step 2: Test SFTP Authentication and Encryption
To verify authentication and encryption mechanisms, use SSH in verbose mode:
ssh -o BatchMode=yes -v -p 22 <sftp-server>
Common Errors and Fixes:
- Permission denied (publickey, password): Verify credentials and authentication methods.
- Cipher exchange errors: Indicates firewall or network-related issues; check NSG rules and firewall settings.
- No response from the server: Indicates possible blocking due to outbound restrictions from Logic Apps or Function Apps.
2. Troubleshooting HTTPS Connectivity
Step 1: Check Network Connectivity
Use tnc and tcping to check if the HTTPS endpoint is accessible:
# Using Test-NetConnection (PowerShell) tnc <https-server> -Port 443 # Using tcping (Command Prompt) tcping <https-server> 443
Common Errors and Fixes:
- Connection refused / Request timed out: Indicates network issues such as NSG rules blocking outbound connections.
- No response from server: Could be due to incorrect routing or firewall policies.
Step 2: Verify SSL/TLS Handshake and Certificate
Use OpenSSL to test TLS handshake and certificate validation:
openssl s_client -connect <https-server>:443
Common Errors and Fixes:
- Unable to verify certificate: The SSL certificate might be missing or untrusted; check if the certificate is valid and trusted by Azure.
- TLS handshake failure: Possible cause is a mismatch in TLS versions; ensure that Logic Apps and Function Apps support the required TLS version (1.2+ recommended).
- Certificate not getting downloaded: Likely a firewall or network issue; investigate NSG, firewall, and VNET settings.
The environment block used to start a process can not be longer than 65535 bytes” in Azure Logic Apps
When working with Azure Logic Apps/ Function Apps/ App Service, you might encounter the following error:
“The environment block used to start a process cannot be longer than 65535 bytes. Your environment block is 85754 bytes long. Remove some environment variables and try again.”
This happens because **Azure app settings** are stored as **environment variables**, and Windows enforces a strict 65,535-byte limit on the total size of these variables. If the combined size exceeds this limit, the process fails to start.
Why Does This Happen?
In Azure Logic Apps, this issue typically arises due to:
- Too many app settings defined in the configuration.
- Very large values stored in app settings.
- App settings with Azure Key Vault references, where the **size of the actual secret value** also contributes to the total environment block size.
- Dependencies (e.g., SDKs, connectors) adding long **environment variables** automatically.
Even though Key Vault references are intended to keep secrets secure, the **retrieved secret value** is still counted towards the **app setting size**, potentially leading to this issue.
How to Fix It
1. Identify Large App Settings
To check the total size of app settings in Azure:
- Go to the Azure Portal.
- Navigate to your Logic App β Configuration.
- Review the app settings listed under the Application settings tab.
If you are using Key Vault references, be aware that the actual **size of the secret value** is included in the environment block.
2. Remove or Reduce Unnecessary App Settings
- Delete unused app settings that are no longer required.
- Shorten long values, especially for connection strings, JSON configurations, or large text-based settings.
- Avoid storing large secrets in Key Vault if they are referenced in app settings, as their size still counts towards the limit.
3. Store Large Data in External Services
- Use Azure Key Vault with direct API calls instead of app setting references. This prevents secrets from being loaded as environment variables.
- Use Azure App Configuration for managing configurations separately from app settings.
- Store large JSON configurations or data-heavy settings in Azure Blob Storage or Cosmos DB.
4. Restart the Logic App
After making changes, restart your Logic App for the new settings to take effect.

You must be logged in to post a comment.