Nutshell Series, Security

🧾 SAST vs DAST Comparison

Feature SAST (Static Application Security Testing) DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing)
Testing Type White-box Black-box
Access to Code Required (analyzes source code or binaries) Not required (tests from outside the app)
When Used Early in SDLC (during coding/build phase) Later in SDLC (during or after deployment)
What It Tests Source code, bytecode, or binaries Running application, web interfaces, APIs
Finds Code-level issues (e.g., SQL injection, secrets) Runtime issues (e.g., logic flaws, auth problems)
False Positives Higher (due to theoretical analysis) Lower (based on real execution)
Speed Fast (no need to run the app) Slower (requires deployed app and interactions)
Tool Examples SonarQube, Checkmarx, Fortify OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite, Acunetix
Language Dependency Language-specific Language-agnostic
Use Case Secure code review, CI/CD integration Real-world attack simulation, post-deployment testing

Leave a comment