.NET Framework and .NET Core differ significantly in architecture, deployment, performance, and their support for modern development needs. Below is a detailed comparison covering both high-level and low-level aspects.
Key Differences
| Feature | .NET Framework | .NET Core |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Windows only | Cross-platform (Windows, Linux, macOS) |
| Performance | Moderate due to legacy architecture | Optimized for high performance with Just-In-Time (JIT) and Ahead-Of-Time (AOT) compilation improvements |
| Deployment | Requires installation of .NET Framework on the system | Can be deployed as a self-contained application without requiring .NET installation |
| Microservices Support | Limited support due to monolithic architecture | Designed for microservices with built-in support for containerization (Docker, Kubernetes) |
| Future Development | No longer actively developed (last version .NET Framework 4.8) | Actively maintained, evolved into .NET 8+ |
| Runtime | CLR (Common Language Runtime) with Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation | CoreCLR with improved JIT and support for Ahead-Of-Time (AOT) compilation |
| APIs & Libraries | Includes older Windows-specific APIs (e.g., WCF, Web Forms, Windows Workflow Foundation) | Uses .NET Standard libraries and modern APIs with broader compatibility |
| Development Model | Traditional Windows development with limited DevOps support | Supports modern DevOps practices, CI/CD pipelines, and cloud-native applications |
Low-Level Differences
- Garbage Collection: .NET Core has an improved garbage collection mechanism, including low-latency GC modes suitable for high-performance applications.
- Memory Management: .NET Core optimizes memory usage with Span and ValueTask to reduce allocations and improve efficiency.
- Networking: .NET Core provides an enhanced networking stack with HTTP/2 support, asynchronous programming improvements, and lower latency.
- Security Model: .NET Core follows a more modular security model with built-in support for modern authentication protocols (OAuth, OpenID Connect).
- Threading and Concurrency: .NET Core enhances parallel processing with features like System.Threading.Channels and Task-based asynchronous patterns.
The choice between .NET Framework and .NET Core depends on your needs. If you’re maintaining legacy applications that rely on Windows-specific features, .NET Framework is suitable. However, for new, scalable, high-performance applications, .NET Core (or .NET 8+) is the best choice.